This is another cautionary anatomic study that demonstrates cervical collars are not adequate immobilization devices – except in patients who already do not need them.
This is a cadaveric spinal immobilization study in which C5/C6 instability was induced, and the Ambu extrication collar, the Aspen collar, and no collar were evaluated for range of bending and rotation during a bed transfer simulation.
The results are pretty straightforward. Before the instability was induced, patients had minimal neck movement, whether immobilized or not. After instability was induced, the patients all had significant bending and rotation – nearly the same for the patients in the collars as in no collar at all.
This is consistent with the small amount of prior work done in actual unstable spines; most of the cervical collar data is in healthy volunteers. The limitations of a cervical collar should be recognized, and patients should have their cervical spine evaluated and cleared or intervened on immediately.
“Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury.”
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21397431