…but still probably a good idea.
Out of 225 ACEP councillors responding to a survey, 5 knew of an instance in the past year where a time-out may have prevented an error. So, a year’s worth of personal patient encounters, plus whatever they heard about in their department, multiplied by 225 – which means we’re looking at hundreds of thousands of patient encounters – and there were only a handful of events where a time-out would have helped.
That being said, time-outs have been a Universal Protocol with the National Patient Safety Goals since 2004 because performing the wrong procedure, at the wrong site, on the wrong patient really falls into a category of a “never event”. It does seem like a no-brainer in the ED, where the procedures we’re performing on patients are specifically related to the unique presenting event, but errors still occur – and the magnitude of the harm to the patients who are being harmed is probably greater than the consequences of the additive delay in care to other patients from the cumulative time performing the time-out.